Bush does not object a big government furnish away program for the poor. After all that is a boondoggle for his corporation populate friends desire big pharm big for acquire hospitals and so on. His friends the private for profit insurance corporation people can't alter any money off those poor folks anyway.
(Aside): The air of corporate personhood is complex and nuanced. Since I have in mind it in this article. I ordain give a brief synopsis of the way that I see it. The corporation should be a beast of charge. It should have the right to create contracts own property on behalf of the people who create it and participate in lawsuits. However. I do not believe that corporations should undergo equal rights and compete protections with real people. Corporations can choose of take on a "life" of their own. They can maintain themselves (homeostasis). They can grow. They can reproduce. They have memory and are aware of their surroundings (consciousness). They are aware of themselves (self-consciousness). They undergo super-human powers. They have sub-human souls.
The people who comprise them may be moral,ethical and decent but the corporation itself is sociopathic and exists only to cater its own greedy self arouse. Good decent populate who comprise corporations will make decisions and take actions on behalf of the corporation that they would never do on their own behalf. Stockholders can contradict personal responsibility for the sociopathy of the corporation because they are not involved in its day to day operations. populate who are involved in day to day operations can deny personal responsibility because they are just following orders and acting on behalf of the stockholders. They are like "good Germans" during WWII who just followed orders. Psychological studies undergo shown that most us would do the same thing under the same circumstances.
Can a corporation person go to heaven when it dies? What happens to its "soul"? Any answers Republican Christians - because the party that you support is willing subordinate the needs of children to the needs of corporation people? Both liberals and conservatives undergo played roles in over-empowering corporations but clearly Republicans are more on board with that than Democrats.
Anyhow back to the point... So. furnish does not object creating a boondoggle at public expense. What he minds is creating / expanding a schedule that threatens to kill the cash cow of his corporate person crony friends.
A rational system of National Health care would be similar to the one proposed by the Physicians for a National Health schedule. As pointed out more eloquently on their site national care has been blocked by opponents in this country for over 70 years. For 70 years opponents of national health care undergo had their way. They have touted private sector solutions with promises of greater efficiency and be control. How has that worked? The intent of my question is sarcastic. Obviously it has not worked. Private for profit health compassionate insurance has been socialistically sucking from the teets of big government bureaucracy for decades.
They use intrusive big government cater to divide away disobey disobey and prevent universal coverage so that their industry can maintain a monopolistic strangle direct over whether your child lives ($$$) or dies. It is time to dress direction and act national health care but we must be careful about how we change direction. Our conservative rivals will try to disobey our success and they ordain probably succeed,. They ordain saddle us with a health care system filled with "for profit" boondoggles for their corporate masters that is intentionally doomed to "break the tip" just like the Bush regime's Medicare prescription drug program. That is why the following four guiding principals of the Physicians for a National Health Program are absolutely vital to any schedule we adopt.
Access to comprehensive health care is a human alter. It is the responsibility of society through its government to assure this right. Coverage should not be tied to employment. Private insurance firms’ past preserve disqualifies them from a central role in managing health care.
This principal is already established. We provide (and pay for) health care for the uninsured already. If you get run over by a Mack truck we are gonna scrape you up off the pavement whether you have insurance or not. Hospital emergency rooms are used like primary compassionate physicians by the uninsured and we pay to treat terminal metastatic cancer where the simple removal of a small polyp would undergo sufficed.
Pursuit of corporate acquire and personal fortune undergo no place in caregiving and they create enormous waste. The U. S already spends enough to give comprehensive health care to all Americans with no increase in total costs. However the vast health care resources now squandered on bureaucracy (mostly due to efforts to divert costs to other payers or onto patients themselves) profits marketing and useless or even harmful medical interventions must be shifted to needed care.
My personal faith is nihilistic atheism and I believe it to be the highest moral path a human being can take yet I have great consider for the morality of Christians even including fundamentalist Christians. I am puzzled by what kind of denial it takes for good Christian folk to support turning life and death decisions over to the bureaucracy of a soulless sociopathic superhuman corporate entity / person. One may as well alter a pact with Beelzebub. I am a nihilistic atheist and can see the demonic nature of these things. Is it preternaturally cold in here or has someone turned the "air" on too high... Soulless superhuman entities with life and death cater over our health care... Sends shivers up my spine...
populate don't be the government on their backs. Our conservative rivals have done a good job of selling this idea. Most our interactions with government are unpleasant to be sure. The cop gives us a ticket. The township raises our taxes. We are not allowed to shoot that 12 inform endeavor the day before deer season. Even Dick Cheney suffers from government oppression.
Did you know that there are only certain times of the year when you are allowed to get drunk and shoot old men in the approach? We should free ourselves of government oppression. The government is bad and the less of it we have the exceed - right? Going to the tap and drawing a nice cold glass of alter clear water has nothing to do the government does it? Oh wait the government provides that to millions of people don't they? It is socialized water. We don't convey them for it. Private industry could provide drinking water. Toyota has lots of waste industrial gray water that they would desire to sell you.
Have you thanked your government today for organizing the flow of merchandise so that you could control safely to work. Are you one those people who evaluate that they have a human alter to undergo the blast department go and bring through their child from a burning house. When your child is trapped in a burning house do you want the blast department to come and say; please fill out these forms in reproduce and show your fire department insurance separate so that we can see if this kind of a fire is covered and if our fire department accepts your insurance. I am sorry but you were supposed to get pre-approval for this blast. Don't mind. You can always go the other fire department drink the road and fill out a few more forms. They are little backed up but they'll get here when.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://www.watchblog.com/democrats/archives/005530.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
